under / standings

Dan Chalykoff

danchalykoff@hotmail.com

Why did I use? VII

There is a causal factor of addictive behaviours that was not included in Hashmet’s (2017) list.  I was reminded of this eternal force by a recent article on the British actor, Jason Isaacs.  He stated that, "I've always had an addictive personality and by the age of 16 I'd already passed through drink and was getting started on a decades-long love affair with drugs. Every action was filtered through a burning need I had for being as far from a conscious, thinking, feeling person as possible. No message would get through for nearly 20 years."  That burning need is the necessary but perilous Dionysian strain of human personality.

An indulgence of the Dionysian is what impels people to merge with crowds at rock concerts, hoping their troubled individual identities will disappear into the mass and the moment, ensuring euphoria continues, now and forever.  The Dionysian is usually contrasted with the Apollonian; the former being about the celebration of wine, sex, and music while the latter is about order, reason, and self-control. 

Wine, sex, and music are not innately problematic.  They can be the subject of serious study, joy, and elevation.  Those positive factors are not my current focus.  What interests me about the Dionysian is its call to merged chaos.   There is, within most of us, a desire to be rid of the noise in our heads, the anxiety in our guts, and the self-loathing in our mirrors.  I believe that some of us, like the younger Jason Isaacs, share that burning need to numb-out and be rid of sometimes painful, but always necessary, Apollonian reality. 

“…Nietzsche identifies the Dionysian as a frenzy of self-forgetting in which the self gives way to a primal unity where individuals are at one with others and with nature. Both the Apollonian and the Dionysian are necessary in the creation of art [and personality]. Without the Apollonian, the Dionysian lacks the form and structure [of] coherent...art, and without the Dionysian, the Apollonian lacks the necessary vitality and passion. Although they are diametrically opposed, they are also intimately intertwined (Sparks Notes on Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy, 1872).”  A deep Dionysian dive is a desire to escape the difficulty of life/art.

But, as M. Scott Peck (1978) wrote, “Life is difficult...[however] once it is accepted, the fact that life is difficult no longer matters.”  Yielding to the Dionysian is hedonism; yielding to the Apollonian is rigidity, but balancing these difficult counterforces is vital health.

Comments

6 Responses to “Why did I use? VII”

  1. Allan says:

    Funny, I have always found life relatively easy. I just enjoy the experience… good or bad.

    Reading this what I see is the struggle to create the self. Keirkegaard wrote about this in his infinite and finite essay. We are in a struggle to belong to a group and explore possible selves. Too much of either one and we never become a self.

    • Dan Chalykoff says:

      Allan, thanks for reading & commenting. I’m so glad you (also) see the Dionysian and Apollonian as parts of self-formation. I’ve just started learning about Kierkegaard and will now keep an eye out for that paper and that theme.

  2. Heavy C says:

    “What interests me about the Dionysian is its call to merged chaos. There is, within most of us, a desire to be rid of the noise in our heads, the anxiety in our guts, and the self-loathing in our mirrors.”

    Very thought provoking!

    This is life, the ultimate chaos we have to live, with two types of personslities. The clash between D and A can lead to much peril and in my opinion would be the sole reason behind all mental illness. Some are more chaotic in their ways than others but we’re all looking for that balance. The Apollonian should subsequebtly be drawn to chaos to, because it is the polar opposite. When two opposing forces meet, chaos ensues. We can only strive for peace and keep dealing with bullshit.

    • Dan Chalykoff says:

      Hey, Chris, thanks for reading and for the response. If it’s provoking thought, it’s working. The balance you speak of also changes with context and age–our essence remains the same but the (necessary) forces in play, within and without, recede and advance, as required. Or so I believe.

  3. Claudia Brown says:

    While I understand and agree with what you have written, I think it could have been expressed in more
    accessible terms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *